Comparing Predictors Influencing Restenosis Following High-Dose Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty and Fluoropolymer-Based Drug-Eluting Stenting in Femoropopliteal Artery Lesions.

PURPOSE: Despite widespread use of anti-restenosis devices, drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and drug-eluting stents (DESs), their appropriate use for femoropopliteal (FP) lesions has not been well investigated and the risk factors for restenosis have not been compared. To investigate risk factors associated with restenosis after endovascular therapy using DCB and DES for contemporary FP lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center, retrospective, observational study evaluated 378 FP lesions in 273 patients treated with DCB (278 lesions in 193 patients) or DES (120 lesions in 106 patients). The DCB used was high-dose DCB (IN.PACT, Admiral. Medtronic, Inc.) and DES was fluoropolymer-based DES (ELUVIA, Boston Scientific). Vessel preparation failure was defined as a residual stenosis of ≥50% and a dissection grade of D or greater on pre-dilatation angiography. The outcome measure was restenosis, and factors associated with restenosis in the DCB and DES groups were assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The 2-year restenosis rate was not significantly different between the DCB and DES groups (29%±4% vs. 24%±5%, p=0.42). Interaction analysis demonstrated that popliteal lesions and plaque burden of ≥50% were restenosis-related factors for DES but not for DCB, whereas vessel preparation failure was a factor for DCB but not for DES (p<0.05). Vessel diameter of <6 mm and nodular calcification were risk factors in both groups (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In contemporary FP lesions, smaller vessels and nodular calcification were shared restenosis-related factors for high-dose DCB and fluoropolymer-based DES. Popliteal lesions and plaque burden of ≥50% were restenosis-related factors for fluoropolymer-based DES and vessel preparation failure for high-dose DCB. CLINICAL IMPACT: Shared and differential restenosis-related factors after endovascular therapy using high-dose drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and fluoropolymer-based drug-eluting stents (DESs) in contemporary femoropopliteal (FP) lesions are unclear. This single-center retrospective study included 378 FP lesions in 273 patients with lower-extremity arterial disease (high-dose DCB, 278 lesions in 193 patients; fluoropolymer-based DES, 120 lesions in 106 patients). Smaller vessels and calcified nodules were shared restenosis-related factors for both high-dose DCB and fluoropolymer-based DES, whereas popliteal lesions and plaque burden of ≥50% were restenosis-related factors for fluoropolymer-based DES and vessel preparation failure for high-dose DCB.

Clinical Impact of the Size of Drug-Coated Balloon Therapy on Restenosis Rate in Femoropopliteal Lesions.

PURPOSE: Although the size of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) is determined according to the vessel diameter during femoropopliteal (FP)-endovascular therapy (EVT), the measurements of the vessel diameter vary among modalities and its definitions. The aim of this study was to reveal whether the DCB size fitting (1) angiographically-measured lumen diameter (Angio-lumen size), (2) intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-measured lumen diameter (IVUS-lumen size), or (3) IVUS-measured external elastic membrane (EEM) diameter (IVUS-EEM size) would be beneficial in restenosis occurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study included 231 de novo FP lesions in 165 patients with peripheral artery disease treated with IN.PACT Admiral DCB under IVUS evaluation. The reference vessel diameter was evaluated as the lumen or EEM diameter at the healthy site distal to the lesion. We retrospectively determined whether the DCB size was close to (ie, equal to or different by <0.5 mm from) Angio-lumen size, IVUS-lumen size, and IVUS-EEM size. The association of the size of DCB with restenosis risk was investigated. RESULTS: The mean lesion length was 13 ± 9 cm and the prevalence of chronic total occlusion was 18%. During a mean follow-up period of 17 ± 9 months, restenosis occurred in 26% of lesions. Lesions treated with a DCB of IVUS-EEM size had a lower 2 year restenosis rate than those treated with a DCB over/under IVUS-EEM size (19.7 ± 5.7% vs 34.5 ± 4.7%, p=0.02 by the log-rank test), while the restenosis rate was not significantly different between DCBs of Angio-lumen size or IVUS-lumen size and those over/under the size (both p>0.05). The multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that DCBs of IVUS-EEM size were independently associated with a reduced risk of restenosis (adjusted hazard ratio 0.50; 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.95; p=0.03). CONCLUSION: The DCBs of IVUS-EEM size, but not of Angio-lumen size or IVUS-lumen size, were associated with a reduced risk of restenosis after FP-EVT. Determining the DCB size according to IVUS-evaluated EEM diameter would be potentially beneficial in restenosis occurrence.

Predictive Factors for Restenosis Following Stent-Supported Endovascular Therapy with Intravascular Ultrasound Evaluation for Femoropopliteal Chronic Total Occlusion.

PURPOSE: To determine the predictive factors for in-stent restenosis (ISR) following stent-supported endovascular therapy (EVT) with intravascular ultrasound (US) evaluation for femoropopliteal chronic total occlusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. The study included 276 lesions in 251 patients who underwent stent-supported EVT with intravascular ultrasound evaluation for femoropopliteal chronic total occlusion from July 2012 to June 2019. The wire passage route was assessed using intravascular US, and lesions were classified accordingly into 2 groups: intraluminal and subintimal passage. In this study, the intraluminal group was further divided into 3 subgroups by severity of calcification: none, <180°, and ≥180° circumferential. The subintimal group was further divided into 2 subgroups: subintimal passage without or with calcification. The primary outcome measure was ISR. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the association of clinical characteristics with ISR rates. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 19 months ±16, during which time ISR was observed in 31% of lesions. After multivariate analysis, an increased degree of plaque burden (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.101) and subintimal passage with calcification (HR = 3.408) were associated with an increased risk of ISR; a larger distal external elastic membrane area (HR = 0.898) and use of a stent graft (HR = 0.130) were significantly associated with a reduced risk of ISR. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that factors associated with ISR after stent-supported EVT with intravascular US evaluation were distal external elastic membrane area, plaque burden, subintimal passage with calcification, and use of a stent graft.